<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Light Fighters: Useful Option or an Unnecessary Substitute?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://aeronaut.media/articles-en/en-all-about-light-fighters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://aeronaut.media/articles-en/en-all-about-light-fighters/</link>
	<description>Website about everything that flies above the ground: aviation, UAVs and drones, rockets, space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://aeronaut.media/articles-en/en-all-about-light-fighters/#comment-3327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aeronaut.media/?p=8854#comment-3327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Plenty of the technical specs you cite in your article regarding both the M-346 and Yak-130 are wrong. For example in a dive the M-346 reaches easily mach 1.12. And in a clean configuration with full fuel at angels 15 it has no trouble reaching mach 0.93 as I personally experienced.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of the technical specs you cite in your article regarding both the M-346 and Yak-130 are wrong. For example in a dive the M-346 reaches easily mach 1.12. And in a clean configuration with full fuel at angels 15 it has no trouble reaching mach 0.93 as I personally experienced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
